Program Logic Engage and External Evaluator †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Program Logic Engage and External Evaluator. Answer: Purpose The program was created in response to the rapid proliferation and steady rise in the number of cases due to open defecation on the shoreline and into water bodies, subsequently resulting in the increase of water-borne diseases. It is aimed at promoting the use of latrines in order to counter open defecation-related outcomes (Horwitz et al, 2016). The program is largely dedicated to advocating for the use of latrines, observing sanitation in compliance with health policies. It is also aimed at improving the economic conditions of the region by protecting marine life which is the primary source of livelihood through countering cases of open defecation near water bodies. It is aimed at enforcing projects to develop, update and enhance clean surroundings, sanitation, and economic development (Vyas et al. 2014). It seeks to establish new measures of construction, availability, and use of latrines. Program objectives To improve and reconstruct the economic status of residents To counter the spread of water-borne diseases To enforce the use and availability of latrines in every homestead To introduce measures to prevent water contaminations To ensure marine life is protected from extinction To counter open defecation In this evaluation, three broad categories of key evaluation questions are used to assess whether the program is appropriate, effective and efficient. Appropriateness questions To what extent does the program address the identified need? Is the program being implemented correctly? Effectiveness question To what extent does the program achieving the intended outcomes? To what extent is the program producing worthwhile results? What were unintended outcomes produced? Efficiency questions To what extent is the relationship between inputs and outputs timely and to expected standards? What has been the ratio of costs to benefits? Methodologies Observation It is a way of gathering data by watching behavior, events, watching physical characteristics of the study subject (O'NEILL and KUBANY, 1959). Surveys Surveys and protocols for interviews are used to capture information about a program. The researchers select a portion of the population in which they major their study on. In the context, the group selects several homesteads to study from them (Tourangeau et al. 2011). Interviews and questionnaire Interviews can be conducted in person or via digital platforms to collect information about the program and the modification to be made. The audience is given the opportunity to air their opinions and suggestions about the program. Deliverables The program leads to improvement of sanitation in Itaukei village which is hindered by continuous open defection. This has been done through establishing latrines few meters from the households and thus addressing the problem of inadequate latrines in the area. The program is championing the prevention and spread of water-borne diseases in the village by addressing its causes and offering remedies to counter the diseases. The environment and marine life are preserved by use of measures introduced by the program, and since fishing is the main economic activity in the region, the economic stability is restored and poverty level reduced Context and Stakeholders information The program incorporates several stakeholders who provide capital and the necessary funding. Some stakeholders can be involved in designing and conduction the evaluation. They are informed about the progress of the program through stakeholder meetings, reports and other means of communication. Red Cross can be involved in education and public awareness campaigns to ensure that the community understands the need for the program. The local government as the main stakeholder of the program, have a direct impact on the program and its approval and support act as the stepping stone for the commencement of the program. References Coffey, D., Gupta, A., Hathi, P., Khurana, N., Spears, D., Srivastav, N. and Vyas, S., 2014. Revealed preference for open defecation.Economic Political Weekly,49(38), p.43. Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E. and Tourangeau, R., 2011.Survey methodology(Vol. 561). John Wiley Sons. Jenkins, A.P., Jupiter, S., Mueller, U., Jenney, A., Vosaki, G., Rosa, V., Naucukidi, A., Mulholland, K., Strugnell, R., Kama, M. and Horwitz, P., 2016. Health at the sub-catchment scale: typhoid and its environmental determinants in Central Division, Fiji.EcoHealth,13(4), pp.633-651. O'NEILL, H.E. and KUBANY, A.J., 1959. Observation methodology and supervisory behavior.Personnel Psychology,12(1), pp.85-95.